That huts cannot be lived in full time?
which to me says that they are essentially holiday homes or glamping sites.
when i first read about the 30m2 building regulations being lighter, it sounded like you could actually go live in the wild & off the grid, like many do in America/Canada. I go so exited, the in came the money part, money for planning money for this that & the next thing and for a lot of folk it's a lot of money so only open to a select society yet again by the looks of it.
Now I know a lot of re-wilding would need to be done in Scotland to support being able to live off the land fully, foraging for berries, fishing, own water supply etc. but it is do able if the right people do it.
someone please tell me I'm wrong
Even in vast wildernesses like Alaska getting land and hut comes with costs and regulations.
https://dnr.alaska.gov/mlw/landsales